Measuring Conversational Productivity in Child Forensic Interviews
Published in arXiv, 2018
Recommended citation: V. Ardulov, M. Kumar, S. Williams, T. Lyon, and S. Narayanan. 2018. Measuring Conversational Productivity in Child Forensic Interviews. ArXiv e-prints (June 2018). arXiv:cs.CL/1806.0335 https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03357
Abstract: Child Forensic Interviewing (FI) presents a challenge for effective information retrieval and decision making. The high stakes associated with the process demand that expert legal interviewers are able to effectively establish a channel of communication and elicit substantive knowledge from the child-client while minimizing potential for experiencing trauma. As a first step toward computationally modeling and producing quality spoken interviewing strategies and a generalized understanding of interview dynamics, we propose a novel methodology to computationally model effectiveness criteria, by applying summarization and topic modeling techniques to objectively measure and rank the responsiveness and conversational productivity of a child during FI. We score information retrieval by constructing an agenda to represent general topics of interest and measuring alignment with a given response and leveraging lexical entrainment for responsiveness. For comparison, we present our methods along with traditional metrics of evaluation and discuss the use of prior information for generating situational awareness.
Prefered Citation: V. Ardulov, M. Kumar, S. Williams, T. Lyon, and S. Narayanan. 2018. Measuring Conversational Productivity in Child Forensic Interviews. ArXiv e-prints (June 2018). arXiv:cs.CL/1806.0335’